Ghost Hunter vs Paranormal Investigator: Is there a difference?
Each person is involved in the paranormal for one reason or another and it doesn't necessarily involve work on the individuals part to ascertain any critical thinking or deep theoretical discussion. It just comes down to having fun and relaying experiences. So here is my perception of the terms...
Ghost Hunter- A ghost hunter has already made his mind up. When he arrives at a location his main objective is to experience the paranormal. Like a hunter, he uses his various tools to draw in the prey and hopes to have interaction with the tools he brought. In most cases a ghost hunter won't require documenting phenomena or experiences that aren't "paranormal" to him. Upon review of his experiences and any data, he will not dig beneath the surface to find solutions to the anomalies. Rather, he will accept that based on his perception of the event, these do not belong therefore they are paranormal.Paranormal Investigator- The investigator on the other hand
has done extensive planning and forethought before arriving at the location.
They have dusted off their critical thinking skills, generated documents to
make notes, done interviews, created plans, done some historical research, and
packed up the necessary equipment to document their findings. When the P.I.
investigates they make notes of potential sounds and visuals that could create
false positives, they have done baselines, taken pictures for posterity, and
done a thorough walk through to recreate any experiences that may answer the
questions that they seek. But for the P.I. the investigation is only a small
part of the case. There are hours of research, review, hypothesizing, note
taking, discussion, and possibly more investigations. The P.I. leaves bias at
the door and only seeks to find factual information. When no logical answers
can be found, they are left with labeling the experiences as paranormal.
Comments
Post a Comment